Classification of Tempeh Maturity Using Decision Tree and Three Texture Features

- Istiadi - Universitas Widyagama Malang, Indonesia
- Faqih - Universitas Widyagama Malang, Indonesia
Aviv Rahman - Universitas Widyagama Malang, Indonesia
Dean Aziz - Universitas Widyagama Malang, Indonesia
April Hananto - Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
Sarina Sulaiman - Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
Candra Zonyfar - Sun Moon University, South Korea

Citation Format:



Tempe is an average food from Indonesia, eaten in Indonesia. Even today, tempe is around the world, and vegans around the world use tempeh as a meat substitute. This study plans to work on the accuracy of tempe characterization by utilizing the three-element extraction technique and the choice tree arrangement strategy. This research uses a decision tree method with three texture features in its classification. The results obtained indicate that this method has the highest Gabor channel level, including extraction, which is 71% accuracy, the split proportion is 10;90 and the lowest is 60% with parted balance of 90:10. The most important level value of GCLM extraction precision is 86% with a split proportion of 90;10 and the lowest price level and 60% level with a split ratio of 10;90 for Wavelet including the highest extraction rate price is 77%. It can be said that from the extraction of three elements, GLCM is the element extraction with the highest value from Gabor and Wavelet, including extraction at a split proportion of 10:90 by 86%. The test shows the Featured Tree highlight designation. The extraction technique was superior to different strategies for interaction characterization of tempe development quality. In the next research, improve the accuracy performance so that it can reach 100% using the CNN deep learning method. Then you can also add Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Naive Bayes methods based on the GLCM Extraction feature.


GLCM; classification; decision tree; extraction.

Full Text:



A. Wahid, “Improving the Quality of Tempe Products with GMP and Model Based Integrated Process Improvement in SME Pacarkeling,†J. Knowl. Ind. Eng., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2021.

Y. Hendrawan et al., “Classification of soybean tempe quality using deep learning,†J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Environ. Sci., vol. 924, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/924/1/012022.

A. A. Permana, A. T. Perdana, and R. Riadhi, “Tempe Freshness Determination On Mobile Application,†J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1844, no. 1, pp. 0–5, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1844/1/012022.

H. A. Dahlan, Y. Nambu, S. P. Putri, and E. Fukusaki, “Effects of Soaking Tempe in Vinegar on Metabolome and Sensory Profiles,†Metabolites, vol. 12, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.3390/metabo12010030.

B. Charbuty and A. Abdulazeez, “Classification Based on Decision Tree Algorithm for Machine Learning,†J. Appl. Sci. Technol. Trends, vol. 2, no. 01, pp. 20–28, 2021, doi: 10.38094/jastt20165.

B. Yanuki, A. Y. Rahman, and Istiadi, “Image Classification of Canaries Using Artificial Neural Network,†2021 5th Int. Conf. Informatics Comput. Sci., pp. 12–17, 2021, doi: 10.1109/icicos53627.2021.9651905.

S. N. Shorabeh, N. N. Samany, F. Minaei, H. K. Firozjaei, M. Homaee, and A. D. Boloorani, “A decision model based on decision tree and particle swarm optimization algorithms to identify optimal locations for solar power plants construction in Iran,†Renew. Energy, vol. 187, pp. 56–67, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.011.

L. Ge et al., “Three Dimensional Apple Tree Organs Classification And Yield Estimation Algorithm Based On Multi-Features Fusion And Support Vector Machine,†Inf. Process. Agric., no. xxxx, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.inpa.2021.04.011.

J. Zhou et al., “Optimization Of Support Vector Machine Through The Use Of Metaheuristic Algorithms In Forecasting TBM Advance Rate,†Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 97, no. November 2020, p. 104015, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2020.104015.

P. Harsani et al., “Color Extraction And Edge Detection Of Nutrient Deficiencies In Cucumber Leaves,†vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 2020.

E. Dumitrescu, S. Hué, C. Hurlin, and S. Tokpavi, “Machine learning for credit scoring: Improving logistic regression with non-linear decision-tree effects,†Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 297, no. 3, pp. 1178–1192, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.06.053.

A. L. Hananto, S. Sulaiman, S. Widiyanto, and A. Y. Rahman, “Evaluation Comparison Of Wave Amount Measurement Results In Brass-Plated Tire Steel Cord Using RMSE And Cosine Similarity,†Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 22, no. 1, p. 207, 2021, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v22.i1.pp207-214.

Y. Guo, Z. Zhang, and F. Tang, “Feature Selection With Kernelized Multi-Class Support Vector Machine,†Pattern Recognit., vol. 117, p. 107988, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2021.107988.

J. Chen, Z. Li, X. Wang, and J. Zhai, “A hybrid monotone decision tree model for interval-valued attributes,†Adv. Comput. Intell., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s43674-021-00016-6.

L. Lin et al., “Validation and refinement of cropland data layer using a spatial-temporal decision tree algorithm,†Sci. Data, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01169-w.

A. Y. Rahman, “Classification of Starling Image Using Artificial Neural Networks,†ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., pp. 309–314, 2021, doi: 10.1145/3479645.3479690.

G. Bertrand et al., “Delineating groundwater contamination risks in southern coastal metropoles through implementation of geochemical and socio-environmental data in decision-tree and geographical information system,†Water Res., vol. 209, no. August 2021, p. 117877, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117877.

M. Lashgari and S. M. Shahrtash, “Fast online decision tree-based scheme for predicting transient and short-term voltage stability status and determining driving force of instability,†Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 137, no. October 2021, p. 107738, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107738.

H. F. Zhou, J. W. Zhang, Y. Q. Zhou, X. J. Guo, and Y. M. Ma, “A feature selection algorithm of decision tree based on feature weight,†Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 164, no. July 2020, p. 113842, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113842.

R. F. Annisa Maharani Suyono, Karismawaty Sintia Dewi and A. Anwar, “Standard Time Calculation Of Tempe Production Process Using Snapback Time Study Method,†vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2021.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization
ISSN 2549-9610  (print) | 2549-9904 (online)
Organized by Society of Visual Informatocs, and Institute of Visual Informatics - UKM and Soft Computing and Data Mining Centre - UTHM
W :
E :,,

View JOIV Stats

Creative Commons License is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.