Grey Level Differences Matrix for Alcoholic EEG Signal Classification

Bandiyah Sri Aprillia - Telkom University, Terusan Buah Batu, Bandung 40257, Indonesia
Achmad Rizal - Telkom University, Terusan Buah Batu, Bandung 40257, Indonesia
Muhammad Arik Geraldy Fauzi - Telkom University, Terusan Buah Batu, Bandung 40257, Indonesia


Citation Format:



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.62527/joiv.8.1.2602

Abstract


Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals can provide information on abnormalities in a person's brain and characterize brain activity. Brain injury or diseases can manifest as brain disorders. Trauma or the use of specific chemicals or medications, such as alcohol, can result in brain damage. Previous research has demonstrated variations in the patterns of EEG signals between alcohol-using and non-drinking people. Various techniques, including wavelet and entropy, have been developed to detect alcoholic EEG using event-related potential (ERP) testing. This work proposes a feature extraction technique based on texture analysis for the classification of alcohol EEG signals because ERP-measured EEG often involves many channels.  An NxM image is thought to be equivalent to an EEG signal with N channels and a recording duration of M samples. The NxM matrix is formed by channelizing the N-channel EEG signal in this investigation. Normalization is then used to get a matrix value of 0-255 or an 8-bit image in the following step. Five features are measured in four directions, and the Grey Level Difference Matrix (GLDM) approach is utilized for feature extraction. Using five grey-level difference matrix (GLDM) features and linear discriminant analysis as a classifier, the maximum accuracy was achieved at 73.3%. Image processing can still be used to increase accuracy even though the final product is less accurate than the earlier technique. The suggested approach can still be adjusted to work with biomedical signals or image processing techniques like the Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM).

Keywords


Electroencephalogram; alcoholic; grey-level difference matrix; classifier

Full Text:

PDF

References


J. Rehm, “The risks associated with alcohol use and alcoholism,” Alcohol Res Health, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 135–143, 2011.

I. Wijayanto, A. Rizal, and A. Humairani, “Seizure Detection Based on EEG Signals Using Katz Fractal and SVM Classifiers,” in 2019 5th International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech), IEEE, Oct. 2019, pp. 78–82. doi: 10.1109/ICSITech46713.2019.8987487.

S. Hadiyoso, L. F. A. R. Cynthia, T. L. E. R. Mengko, and H. Zakaria, “Early Detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Quantitative Analysis of EEG Signals,” in 2019 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics, Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering (BioMIC) - Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, 2019, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/BioMIC48413.2019.9034892.

A. K. Mutasim, R. S. Tipu, M. R. Bashar, Md. K. Islam, and M. A. Amin, “Computational Intelligence for Pattern Recognition in EEG Signals,” 2018, pp. 291–320. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-89629-8_11.

T. K. Padma Shri and N. Sriraam, “Spectral entropy feature subset selection using SEPCOR to detect alcoholic impact on gamma sub band visual event related potentials of multichannel electroencephalograms (EEG),” Applied Soft Computing Journal, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.041.

J. Gopika Gopan, K., Sinha, N., Dinesh Babu, “Hybrid features based classification of alcoholic and non-alcoholic EEG,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Computing and Communication Technologies (CONECCT), 2015, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/CONECCT.2015.7383898.

P. D. Purnamasari, A. A. P. Ratna, and B. Kusumoputro, “Relative wavelet bispectrum feature for alcoholic EEG signal classification using artificial neural network,” in QiR 2017 - 2017 15th International Conference on Quality in Research (QiR): International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2017. doi: 10.1109/QIR.2017.8168473.

M. Saddam, H. Tjandrasa, and D. A. Navastara, “Classification of alcoholic EEG using wavelet packet decomposition, principal component analysis, and combination of genetic algorithm and neural network,” Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and System, ICTS 2017, vol. 2018-Janua, no. 0, pp. 19–24, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ICTS.2017.8265600.

C. Ekaputri, R. Widadi, and A. Rizal, “EEG Signal Classification for Alcoholic and Non-Alcoholic Person using Multilevel Wavelet Packet Entropy and Support Vector Machine,” in 2020 8th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT), IEEE, Jun. 2020, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1109/ICoICT49345.2020.9166233.

R. Palaniappan and P. Raveendran, “Genetic algorithm to select features for fuzzy ARTMAP classification of evoked EEG,” in IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems, Proceedings, APCCAS, 2002. doi: 10.1109/APCCAS.2002.1115119.

A. K. Mutasim, R. S. Tipu, M. R. Bashar, M. K. Islam, and M. A. Amin, “Computational Intelligence for Pattern Recognition in EEG Signals,” in Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 777, no. May, Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 291–320. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-89629-8_11.

R. Widadi, I. Soesanti, and O. Wahyunggoro, “EEG Classification Using Elliptic Filter and Multilayer Perceptron Based on Gamma Activity Features,” in Proceedings - 2018 4th International Conference on Science and Technology, ICST 2018, IEEE, Aug. 2018, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICSTC.2018.8528568.

J. S. Weszka, C. R. Dyer, and A. Rosenfeld, “A Comparative Study of Texture Measures for Terrain Classification,” Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. SMC-6, no. 2, pp. 269–285, 1976.

X. L. Zhang, H. Begleiter, B. Porjesz, W. Wang, and A. Litke, “Event related potentials during object recognition tasks,” Brain Res Bull, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 531–538, 1995, doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(95)02023-5.

A. Rizal, V. A. P. Handzah, and P. D. Kusuma, “Heart Sounds Classification Using Short-Time Fourier Transform and Gray Level Difference Method,” Ingénierie des systèmes d information, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 369–376, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.18280/isi.270302.

A. A. Goshtasby, Image Registration. in Advances in Pattern Recognition. London: Springer London, 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-2458-0.

D. T. Barus, F. Masri, and A. Rizal, “NGBoost Interpretation Using LIME for Alcoholic EEG Signal Based on GLDM Feature Extraction,” Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 1294, pp. 894–904, 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-63322-6_76.

C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, “Support vector machine,” Mach Learn, pp. 1303–1308, 1995, doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-73003-5_299.

G. Durif, L. Modolo, J. Michaelsson, J. E. Mold, S. Lambert-Lacroix, and F. Picard, “High dimensional classification with combined adaptive sparse PLS and logistic regression,” Bioinformatics, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 485–493, 2018, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx571.

M. T. Viega, E. Marvin, R. Jayadi, and T. Mauritsius, “Heart disease prediction system using data mining classification techniques: Naïve bayes, knn, and decision tree,” International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 3028–3035, 2020, doi: 10.30534/ijatcse/2020/82932020.

R. Rahim, T. Afriliansyah, H. Winata, D. Nofriansyah, Ratnadewi, and S. Aryza, “Research of Face Recognition with Fisher Linear Discriminant,” IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, vol. 300, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/300/1/012037.

A. Rizal, R. Hidayat, and H. A. A. Nugroho, “Hjorth Descriptor Measurement on Multidistance Signal Level Difference for Lung Sound Classification,” Journal of Telecommunication Electronic and Computer Engineering, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 23–27, 2017