Analyzing COBIT 5 IT Audit Framework Implementation using AHP Methodology
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30630/joiv.1.2.18
Abstract
COBIT has been known as the best practice standard in IT Governance, both in management or evaluated of the IT utilization. The role of IT Audit framework to evaluate the benefits of Information Technology in an enterprise either its gain benefits or fail in order to achieved the business objective. In Indonesia, most organization has been implemented the IT as their main support of process business, and deliberately conduct the evaluation of the implementation used some IT Audit framework such as ITIL, TOGAF, COBIT and other Government rule. Those frameworks have been known as an IT governance framework, most of organizations are choosing COBIT and ITIL due to the internal control issues. Therefore, this research will be focus on COBIT 5 utilization as an IT audit frameworks, a comparison also will be done between the COBIT 5 and ITIL. The comprehensive parameters in COBIT 5 which provides 5 category process in two domain, management and control will be the variables of prioritizing process among them for each object. This paper will analyze the use of those parameters for some selected organization and prioritize them using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology that will lead to create a new model of IT Audit frameworks based on the user requirement and opinion. the analyzing process the implementation of COBIT 5 framework in some organizations, and priorities the preferred attributes of COBIT 5 that very likely and suitable to the culture and needs of user in Indonesia using AHP Methodology, and create the best qualified model of IT Audit that fit with the requirements of the organizations especially for Indonesia organizations and companies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Tanuwijaya.H, Sarno.R, 2010, ‘Comparation of COBIT Maturity Model and Structural Equation Model for Measuring The Alignment between University Academic Regulations and Information Technology Goals’, International Journal of Computer Sciences and Network Security, Vol 10, No 6, pp 80-92.
ISACA(2012). COBIT 5 enabling processes . in COBIT 5 trainning material.
Sarno,R (2009). Audit System and Information Technology. In Audit System and Technology Information.Institute Technology of Surabaya Publisher. Surabaya, Indonesia.
Afzali P (2010). Effective Governance through Simultaneus Use of COBIT and Val IT. Retrieved from http://ieexplore.org/978
Parvizi,R (2013). Using COBIT and ITIL frameworks to establish the alignment of business and IT Organizations as one of the critical success factors in ERP implementations. Retrieved from http://ieexplore.org/978-1-4673-6490-4/13.
Saaty,L (2000). The Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process Thomas L. Saaty Vol. VI of the AHP Series, , 478 pp., RWS Publ., 2000 (revised). ISBN 0-9620317-6-3.
Detiknas (2014). Dies natalies University of Indonesia. Retrieved from http://www.gassure.com
Huang,Z (2009). An Effecient framework for IT Controls of Bill 198 (Canada Sarbanes-Oaxley) Compliance by Aligning COBIT 4.1, ITIL v3 and ISO/IEC 27002. Retrieved from http://ieexplore.org/10.1109/CSE_2009.336
Weber,Ron. (2000). Information System Controls and Audit. Prentice Hall, Inc; New JErsey
Nugroho,B (2011). Using Organizational Culture Approach and COBIT Framework in Designing of Information Technology Governance on Non Ministrial Government Institute (LPNK):Case study: Center for Scientific Documentation and Information- Indonesian Institute of Sciences. In Journal Electrical and Informatics Bandung Institute of Technology. 2011.
Choi ,W (2009). Assesment of IT Governance using COBIT Framework. In Communication in Computer and Information Science Journal. Vol.62.
IT Governance Institute. COBIT 5 : Enabling Process. Retrieved from http:ITGI.org
Khrisna,A (2014). Risk Management Framework with COBIT 5 and Risk Management Framework for Cloud Computing Integration. Retrieved from http://ieexplore.org/978-1-4799-5100-0/12