How to cite (IEEE): W. Suteddy, D. Agustini, A. Adiwilaga, & D. Atmanto "End-To-End Evaluation of Deep Learning Architectures for Off-Line Handwriting Writer Identification: A Comparative Study," JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization, vol. 7, no. 1, , pp. 178-185, Feb. 2023. https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.7.1.1293

How to cite (APA): Suteddy, W., Agustini, D., Adiwilaga, A., & Atmanto, D. (2023). End-To-End Evaluation of Deep Learning Architectures for Off-Line Handwriting Writer Identification: A Comparative Study. JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 7(1), 178-185. https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.7.1.1293

How to cite (Chicago): Suteddy, Wirmanto, Agustini, Devi, Adiwilaga, Anugrah, AND Atmanto, Dastin. "End-To-End Evaluation of Deep Learning Architectures for Off-Line Handwriting Writer Identification: A Comparative Study" JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization [Online], Volume 7 Number 1 (13 February 2023) https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.7.1.1293

How to cite (Vancouver): Suteddy W, Agustini D, Adiwilaga A, & Atmanto D . End-To-End Evaluation of Deep Learning Architectures for Off-Line Handwriting Writer Identification: A Comparative Study. JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization [Online]. 2023 Feb; 7(1):178-185. https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.7.1.1293

How to cite (Harvard): Suteddy, W., Agustini, D., Adiwilaga, A., & Atmanto, D. ,2023. End-To-End Evaluation of Deep Learning Architectures for Off-Line Handwriting Writer Identification: A Comparative Study. JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization, [Online] 7(1), pp. 178-185. https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.7.1.1293

How to cite (MLA8): Suteddy, Wirmanto, Devi Aprianti Rimadhani Agustini, Anugrah Adiwilaga, & Dastin Aryo Atmanto. "End-To-End Evaluation of Deep Learning Architectures for Off-Line Handwriting Writer Identification: A Comparative Study." JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization [Online], 7.1 (2023): 178-185. Web. 3 Oct. 2023 , https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.7.1.1293

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{JOIV1293,
    	author = {Wirmanto Suteddy and Devi Agustini and Anugrah Adiwilaga and Dastin Atmanto},
    	title = {End-To-End Evaluation of Deep Learning Architectures for Off-Line Handwriting Writer Identification: A Comparative Study},
    	journal = {JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization},
    	volume = {7},
    	number = {1},
    	year = {2023},
    	keywords = {offline writer identification; deep learning; convolutional neural network; comparative study; end-to-end.},
    	abstract = {Identifying writers using their handwriting is particularly challenging for a machine, given that a person’s writing can serve as their distinguishing characteristic. The process of identification using handcrafted features has shown promising results, but the intra-class variability between authors still needs further development. Almost all computer vision-related tasks use Deep learning (DL) nowadays, and as a result, researchers are developing many DL architectures with their respective methods. In addition, feature extraction, usually accomplished using handcrafted algorithms, can now be automatically conducted using convolutional neural networks. With the various developments of the DL method, it is necessary to evaluate the suitable DL for the problem we are aiming at, namely the classification of writer identification. This comparative study evaluated several DL architectures such as VGG16, ResNet50, MobileNet, Xception, and EfficientNet end-to-end to examine their advantages to offline handwriting for writer identification problems with IAM and CVL databases. Each architecture compared its respective process to the training and validation metrics accuracy, demonstrating that ResNet50 DL had the highest train accuracy of 98.86%. However, Xception DL performed slightly better due to the convergence gap for validation accuracy compared to all the other architectures, which were 21.79% and 15.12% for IAM and CVL. Also, the smallest gap of convergence between training and validation accuracy for the IAM and CVL datasets were 19.13% and 16.49%, respectively. The results of these findings serve as the basis for DL architecture selection and open up overfitting problems for future work.},
        	issn = {2549-9904},    	pages = {178--185},    	doi = {10.30630/joiv.7.1.1293},
        	url = {https://joiv.org/index.php/joiv/article/view/1293}
    }
    

Refworks Citation Data :

@article{{JOIV}{1293}, author = {Suteddy, W., Agustini, D., Adiwilaga, A., Atmanto, D.}, title = {End-To-End Evaluation of Deep Learning Architectures for Off-Line Handwriting Writer Identification: A Comparative Study}, journal = {JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization}, volume = {7}, number = {1}, year = {2023}, doi = {10.30630/joiv.7.1.1293}, url = {} }