Development of Early Startup Companies' Valuation Model Based on Android Mobile Application: The Angel Investor's Perspective

Ratna Candra Sari - Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Patriani Wahyu Dewanti - Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
M. Andryzal Fajar - National Yunlin University Science and Technology, Douliou, Yunlin, Taiwan, R.O.C
Denies Priantinah - Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Arin Pranesti - Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia


Citation Format:



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30630/joiv.6.2.992

Abstract


This research aims to develop a valuation model for early startup companies based on an Android mobile application (Valuasi app). This application aims to help early startups to evaluate their company performance. This research method uses the research development method. The first stage is to develop a startup valuation model by determining the criteria using the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method and weighting the criteria using the simple additive weighting (SAW) method. The instrument and the weight determination of the valuation model have been validated from the perspective of angel investors, practitioners, and academics. The second stage is developing an Android-based startup valuation model application. The third stage is an evaluation by the users of the application. Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, the results show that a potential user's intent to use the application is affected by the performance expectancy and social influence toward the application. This valuation model is expected to help early startup companies conduct business valuations, so they can attract investors, especially angel investors. In addition, the results showed that there was a positive response from users in using the 'Valuasi app', which was indicated by the positive and significant effect of performance expectations on usage intentions, and a positive and significant influence on social influence and behavioral intentions on user behavior. This research shows that 'Valuasi app' can be used to assess start up valuation. However, further improvements are needed to support application facilities so as to increase the ease of using the "Start Up Valuation App" application

Keywords


valuation model; early startup; angel investor; Android-based application

Full Text:

PDF

References


Y. Wang, "What are the biggest obstacles to growth of SMEs in developing countries? – An empirical evidence from an enterprise survey," Borsa Istanbul Rev., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 167–176, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.bir.2016.06.001.

F. Eggers, "Masters of disasters? Challenges and opportunities for SMEs in times of crisis," J. Bus. Res., vol. 116, no. May, pp. 199–208, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.025.

G. Festel, M. Wuermseher, and G. Cattaneo, “Valuation of early stage high-tech start-up companies,” Int. J. Bus., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 216–231, 2013.

L. Koenig and J. Tennert, "Tell me something new: startup valuations, information asymmetry, and the mitigating effect of informational updates," Ventur. Cap., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 47–70, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13691066.2022.2026744.

V. Achimská, "Startups, bearers of innovation in globalizing environment and their valuation," SHS Web Conf., vol. 74, p. 01001, 2020, doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20207401001.

A. Derin, "Evaluation of young companies/startups based on the multiples approach and DCF method," 2018.

R. Trichkova and N. Kanaryan, "Startups Valuation: Approaches and Methods," First Balk. Valuat. Conf., no. June, p. 16, 2015.

J. Stankevičiene and S. Žinyte, "Valuation model of new startup companies: Lithuanian case | Naujai isteigtu imoniu vertinimo metodai: Lietuvos atvejis," Bus. Theory Pract., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 379–389, 2011.

K. Brzozowska, "Business angels in poland in comparison to informal venture capital market in european union," Eng. Econ., vol. 2, no. 57, pp. 7–14, 2008, doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.57.2.11540.

Kemenristekdikti, “Menristekdikti Targetkan Indonesia Miliki 4.900 Startup di Tahun 2024,” Biro Kerja Sama dan Komunikasi Publik Kemenristekdikti, pp. 1–10, 2019.

G. a Benjamin and J. Margulis, "The Angel Investor' s Handbook Take-Aways," Rev. Lit. Arts Am., pp. 1–5, 2001.

S. Paul, G. Whittam, and J. Wyper, "Towards a model of the business angel investment process," Ventur. Cap., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 107–125, 2007, doi: 10.1080/13691060601185425.

Z. Ding, K. Au, and F. Chiang, "Social trust and angel investors' decisions: A multilevel analysis across nations," J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 307–321, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.08.003.

C. M. Mason and R. T. Harrison, "Closing the regional equity capital gap: The role of informal venture capital," Small Bus. Econ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 153–172, 1995, doi: 10.1007/BF01108688.

C. Mason, T. Botelho, and R. Harrison, "The changing nature of angel investing: some research implications," Ventur. Cap., vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 177–194, 2019, doi: 10.1080/13691066.2019.1612921.

C. Mitteness, R. Sudek, and M. S. Cardon, "Angel investor characteristics that determine whether perceived passion leads to higher evaluations of funding potential," J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 592–606, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.003.

W. Drover, L. Busenitz, S. Matusik, D. Townsend, A. Anglin, and G. Dushnitsky, "A Review and Road Map of Entrepreneurial Equity Financing Research: Venture Capital, Corporate Venture Capital, Angel Investment, Crowdfunding, and Accelerators," J. Manage., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1820–1853, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0149206317690584.

A. L. Maxwell, S. A. Jeffrey, and M. Lévesque, "Business angel early stage decision making," J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 212–225, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.09.002.

Thiagarajan S., Semmel D., and Semmel M. I, Intructional Development for Training Teachers Of Exceptional Children: A Sourcebook, Minneapoli. Central for Innovation on Teaching the Handicaped, 1974.

I. Im, S. Hong, and M. S. Kang, "An international comparison of technology adoption: Testing the UTAUT model," Inf. Manag., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2010.09.001.

V. Venkatesh, G. M. Morris, B. G. Davis, and D. Davis, "User Accceptance of Information Technology : Toward Unified View," MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003, doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2016.03.015.

T. Zhou, Y. Lu, and B. Wang, "Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption," Comput. Human Behav., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 760–767, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.013.

K. Al-Saedi, M. Al-Emran, T. Ramayah, and E. Abusham, "Developing a general extended UTAUT model for M-payment adoption," Technol. Soc., vol. 62, no. June, p. 101293, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101293.

D. E. Leidner and T. Kayworth, "A review of culture in information systems research: Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict," MIS Q., pp. 357–399, 2006.




Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

__________________________________________________________________________
JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization
ISSN 2549-9610  (print) | 2549-9904 (online)
Organized by Department of Information Technology - Politeknik Negeri Padang, and Institute of Visual Informatics - UKM and Soft Computing and Data Mining Centre - UTHM
W : http://joiv.org
E : joiv@pnp.ac.id, hidra@pnp.ac.id, rahmat@pnp.ac.id

View JOIV Stats

Creative Commons License is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.