Comparative Analysis of the Implementation of Technology Trends, Pedagogy Trends and Education Trends of Science and Non-Science Program Students in Sulawesi

Andi Patmasari - Tadulako University, Palu City, Central Sulawesi, 94148, Indonesia
Dewi Satria Ahmar - Tadulako University, Palu City, Central Sulawesi, 94148, Indonesia
Afrillia Anggreni - Tadulako University, Palu City, Central Sulawesi, 94148, Indonesia
Muhammad Fath Azzajjad - Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, Southeast Sulawesi, 93561, Indonesia
Purnama Ningsih - Tadulako University, Palu City, Central Sulawesi, 94148, Indonesia
Ansari Saleh Ahmar - Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, South Sulawesi, 90222, Indonesia


Citation Format:



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.62527/joiv.8.3-2.3213

Abstract


As a result of their increased exposure to technology, today's students are skilled users of a wide range of digital gadgets in their daily lives. To solve difficulties, they can freely access knowledge across a variety of digital platforms; this ability has to be included into contemporary learning principles. The purpose of this study is to investigate how lecturers might modify innovative teaching methods to better suit the needs of their students. 125 people participated in the survey that we did; 59 of them were from scientific programs and 66 were from non-science programs. The study used observation sheets, interview guides, and questionnaires. The questionnaire was split into two sections: one measured students' opinion of the technology and pedagogical innovations used by lecturers, and the other their reactions to the classroom and educational system. Before any data was collected, the validity and reliability of the instruments were confirmed. The findings showed that students had preferences for different types of technology. Students in scientific programs liked interactive platforms like Edmodo and Google Classroom, while students in other programs liked webinars and video conferences. Additionally, the study found a relationship between the educational trends that lecturers apply, pedagogical innovation, and the learning environment. The results of this study are anticipated to improve instructional practices in digital learning settings and provide a basis for policymaking in continuing education. 


Keywords


pedagogical trends; technological trends; learning environment; education system

Full Text:

PDF

References


E. Garira, “A Proposed Unified Conceptual Framework for Quality of Education in Schools,” Sage Open, vol. 10, no. 1, Jan. 2020, doi:10.1177/2158244019899445.

B. K. Fomba, D. N. D. F. Talla, and P. Ningaye, “Institutional Quality and Education Quality in Developing Countries: Effects and Transmission Channels,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 86–115, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13132-021-00869-9.

C. Wiegand and I. Banerjee, “Recent advances in the applications of iPSC technology,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 60, pp. 250–258, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.05.011.

G. Liu, B. T. David, M. Trawczynski, and R. G. Fessler, “Advances in Pluripotent Stem Cells: History, Mechanisms, Technologies, and Applications,” Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3–32, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12015-019-09935-x.

N. Doghonadze and M. Zoranyan, “Challenges of Multicultural Higher Education In Georgia,” INTED2018 Proceedings, vol. 1, pp. 1077–1085, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.21125/inted.2018.0142.

“A Sociolinguistic Investigation of Making Request Among Sudanese learners at Sudan University for Science and Technology,” Academic International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (AIJSSH), pp. 24–32, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.59675/s243.

P. Pratiwi, T. Hidayat, and A. Amprasto, “Analysis of Guided Inquiry-Based Cladistic E-Worksheet Development to Improve Critical Thinking in High School,” Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 776, Sep. 2022, doi:10.33394/jk.v8i3.5359.

S. Suryadi and N. Priajana, “Initiating Educational Policies for Older Adults: Analysis of The Implementation of Lifelong Learning Concepts,” International Journal Of Education And Humanities (Ijeh), Vol. 1, No. 1, 2020.

B. M. Wiśniewski, “The formation of a pluralistic society and its impact on climate change – implementation of the lifelong learning concept,” Oceanologia, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 588–592, Oct. 2020, doi:10.1016/j.oceano.2020.03.009.

L. Weisberg and K. Dawson, “The Intersection of Equity Pedagogy and Technology Integration in Preservice Teacher Education: A Scoping Review,” Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 327–342, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1177/00224871231182129.

T. Fawns, “An Entangled Pedagogy: Looking Beyond the Pedagogy—Technology Dichotomy,” Postdigital Science and Education, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 711–728, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s42438-022-00302-7.

A. Urbanek, A. Losa, M. Wieczorek-Kosmala, K. Hlaváček, and A. Lokaj, “Did the Quality of Digital Communication Skills in Education Improve after the Pandemic? Evidence from HEIs,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 15, p. 11878, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151511878.

A. O. Acheampong, E. E. O. Opoku, A. Amankwaa, and J. Dzator, “Energy poverty and gender equality in education: Unpacking the transmission channels,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 202, p. 123274, May 2024, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123274.

D. Cahyadi, A. Faturahman, H. Haryani, E. Dolan, and S. Millah, “BCS : Blockchain Smart Curriculum System for Verification Student Accreditation,” International Journal of Cyber and IT Service Management, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 65–83, Apr. 2021, doi:10.34306/ijcitsm.v1i1.20.

L. Closs, M. Mahat, and W. Imms, “Learning environments’ influence on students’ learning experience in an Australian Faculty of Business and Economics,” Learning Environments Research, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 271–285, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10984-021-09361-2.

T. Valtonen et al., “Learning environments preferred by university students: a shift toward informal and flexible learning environments,” Learning Environments Research, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 371–388, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10984-020-09339-6.

Marcus Foth, “Participatory Action Research for Community Engagement,” In Civic Media Technology, Design, Practice, 2016.

V. Revenko, “Education and Music Culture in the Context of Web 2.0,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), vol. 16, no. 10, p. 96, May 2021, doi:10.3991/ijet.v16i10.19693.

S. Yan (闫守轩) and Y. Yang (杨运), “Education Informatization 2.0 in China: Motivation, Framework, and Vision,” ECNU Review of Education, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 410–428, Oct. 2020, doi:10.1177/2096531120944929.

R. Qassrawi, “Education 3.0 Underpinned with the Heutagogical Approach for a Smooth Shift to Distance Learning in Higher Education,” International Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.18488/61.v11i1.3238.

A. M. Nidhom, A. B. N. R. Putra, A. A. Smaragdina, G. D. K. Ningrum, and J. M. Yunos, “Integration of Augmented Reality into MOOC’s in Vocational Education to Support Education 3.0,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), vol. 16, no. 03, pp. 20–31, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v16i03.28961.

S. Chakraborty, Y. Gonzalez-Triana, J. Mendoza, and D. Galatro, “Insights on mapping Industry 4.0 and Education 4.0,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 8, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1150190.

J. Miranda et al., “The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education,” Computers & Electrical Engineering, vol. 93, p. 107278, Jul. 2021, doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107278.

P. Blessinger, A. Samarji, And H. R. Lozada, “Education 4.0 And Its Key Role in Sustainable Development,” University World News.

D. Gürdür Broo, O. Kaynak, and S. M. Sait, “Rethinking engineering education at the age of industry 5.0,” Journal of Industrial Information Integration, vol. 25, p. 100311, Jan. 2022, doi:10.1016/j.jii.2021.100311.

H. Mansur, A. H. Utama, M. H. Mohd Yasin, N. P. Sari, K. A. Jamaludin, and F. Pinandhita, “Development of Inclusive Education Learning Design in the Era of Society 5.0,” Social Sciences, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 35, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/socsci12010035.

R. Supinah and J. Soebagyo, “Analisis Bibliometrik Terhadap Tren Penggunaan ICT Pada Pembelajaran Matematika,” JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), vol. 6, no. 2, p. 276, Jun. 2022, doi:10.33603/jnpm.v6i2.6153.

H. Jiye, “Exploration on Path and Method of Information-based Teaching in Applied Undergraduate Institutions under the Vision of Innovation-driven Development Strategy,” 2021 2nd International Conference on Education, Knowledge and Information Management (ICEKIM), pp. 710–716, Jan. 2021, doi:10.1109/icekim52309.2021.00161.

R. Selvaganesan and J. Jayachithra, “Effectiveness of Multimedia Strategies in Learning Science,” Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (Tojqi), Vol. 12, No. 8, 2021.

S. Caldwell, C. Hendrickson, and L. R. Rilett, “It Is Time to Recognize Communications as a Mode of Transportation,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, vol. 147, no. 7, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1061/jtepbs.0000540.

G. Yu. Peshkova and А. Yu. Samarina, “Digital Economy and Recruitment Potential: Strategical Interconnection and Prospects,” The Education and science journal, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 50–75, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2018-10-50-75.

M. H. Nuryadi and P. Widiatmaka, “Strengthening civic literacy among students through digital literacy in society 5.0,” Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 215–220, May 2023, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v17i2.20746.

S. Byrne, “Making Social Media More Accessible to People with Disabilities,” 3playmedia.

B. Christian, C. Salvador, and G. Christian, “Virtual Reality (VR) in Superior Education Distance Learning: A Systematic Literature Review,” JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 264, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.30630/joiv.5.3.632.

“The Effectiveness of Using Blended Learning Models Against Vocational Education Student Learning Motivation,” International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 7964–7968, Oct. 2020, doi:10.30534/ijatcse/2020/151952020.

N. A. Binti Muhammad Zahruddin, N. D. Kamarudin, R. Mat Jusoh, N. A. Abdul Fataf, and R. Hidayat, “Case Study: Using Data Mining to Predict Student Performance Based on Demographic Attributes,” JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 2460, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.30630/joiv.7.4.02454.

A. Rahmatulloh, A. Ginanjar, I. Darmawan, N. I. Kurniati, and E. Haerani, “Chatbot for Diagnosis of Pregnancy Disorders using Artificial Intelligence Markup Language (AIML),” JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 77, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.30630/joiv.7.1.1595.

Mahirullah, Sri Muslimatul Husna, and Farida Adriani, “Analysis of the Application and Correlation of the Murder Type Collaborative Learning Model on Student Learning Outcomes at Senior High School Jambi,” Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 21–30, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.37251/jee.v4i1.293.

D. Zahner, D. Van Damme, R. Benjamin, and J. Lehrfeld, “Measuring the generic skills of higher education students and graduates: Implementation of CLA+ international.,” Assessing undergraduate learning in psychology: Strategies for measuring and improving student performance., pp. 219–241, 2021, doi: 10.1037/0000183-015.

R. A. Febriani, S. Suseno, J. Budiman, A. S. Saefudin, and A. P. Danadibrata, “Gap Analysis of Graduates Competencies in Manufacturing Engineering Department with the Industry,” International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 75–84, Dec. 2021, doi:10.31098/ijmesh.v4i2.625.

H. H. Alharahsheh and A. Pius, “Exploration of Employability Skills in Business Management Studies Within Higher Education Levels,” International Journal of Sustainable Economies Management, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 52–69, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.4018/ijsem.2020010105.

I. Santosa and R. Mulyana, “The IT Services Management Architecture Design for Large and Medium-sized Companies based on ITIL 4 and TOGAF Framework,” JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 30, Mar. 2023, doi:10.30630/joiv.7.1.1590.

O. V. Okhlupina, “Transformation of Education: Threat or Limitless Opportunities?,” Prepodavatel XXI vek, no. 3, 2020, pp. 22–31, 2020, doi: 10.31862//2073-9613-2020-3-22-31.

K. Gallagher, “Student voice: perceptions of fair treatment in a Foundations program,” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 129–145, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1108/jarhe-03-2018-0037.

M. Islam, N. H. Mazlan, G. Al Murshidi, M. S. Hoque, S. V. Karthiga, and M. Reza, “UAE university students’ experiences of virtual classroom learning during Covid 19,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 10, no. 1, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40561-023-00225-1.

S. Caspari-Sadeghi, “Applying Learning Analytics in Online Environments: Measuring Learners’ Engagement Unobtrusively,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 7, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.840947.

D. Satria Ahmar, M. Fath Azzajjad, And A. Saleh Ahmar, “Adapting to Change: The Effects of Case Study Approaches on Problem-Solving Skills,” Arrus Journal of Mathematics and Applied Science, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2023, Doi: 10.35877/Mathscience2206.

M. F. Azzajjad, D. S. Ahmar, and Muh. Syahrir, “The Effect of Animation Media in Discovery Learning Model on Students’ Representation Ability on Chemical Equilibrium Materials,” Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, Technology, and Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 204–209, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.35877/454ri.asci22125.