Evaluation of Visual Based Augmented Reality (AR) Learning Application (V-ARA-Dculia) for Dyscalculia Learners

Kohilah Miundy - Institute of Visual Informatics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
Halimah Badioze Zaman - Institute of Visual Informatics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
Aliimran Nosrdin - Institute of Visual Informatics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
Kher Ng - Nottingham University, Malaysia Campus, Selangor, Malaysia

Citation Format:

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30630/joiv.3.4.321


The rapid growth in technology have affected processes in various domains such as business, healthcare, agriculture and education. Computer related applications used in these domains are available so easily, that it is impossible to imagine a situation without them. Technologies that were available but hardly commonly used a few decades ago such as Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) have now become technologies that are fast gaining interests in most fields including service related1 fields such as healthcare and education. The basic idea of AR is to superimpose sense enhancements over a real-world environment. It is a perfect solution for learners with learning difficulties as it combines the advantages of multi senses of the learners, helps them to understand learning better when the integration of both virtuality and reality is embedded in their learning applications. AR is mostly effectively used when computer generated visual enhancements are integrated into real life applications. Thus, this paper highlights the evaluation of the visual-based AR learning application to investigate its plausible assistive functions that can help dyscalculia learners learn Mathematics in a more meaningful way. Findings of the study showed that the students who had difficulties on memory, abstraction, sequencing processing, motor and visual perception, found the visual-based Augmented Reality (AR)  technology embedded in an application, a positive assistive learning application that can help dyscalculia learners learn mathematics more effectively.   


dyscalculia; mathematical difficulty; visual based learning application; augmented reality (AR); usability engineering

Full Text:



Albion, P. R. 1999. Heuristic evaluation of educational multimedia: from theory to practice. In 16th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, ASCILITE, (pp. 9-15).

Alsumait, A. 2010. Usability heuristics evaluation for child e-learning applications. JJournal of Software, 5(10), 654–661.

Badni, K. S. 2018. Augmenting History: Case Study Measuring Motivation of Students Using Augmented Reality Apps in History Classes. World Academy of Science, (6).

Balog, A., Pribeanu, C. & Iordache, D. 2007. Augmented Reality in Schools : Preliminary Evaluation Results from a Summer School. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering Vol:1, 1(6), 215–218.

Cowan, R. & Powell, D. 2014. The contributions of domain-general and numerical factors to third-grade arithmetic skills and mathematical learning disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 214–229.

De Paiva Guimarães, M. & Martins, V. F. 2014. A checklist to evaluate augmented reality applications. Proceedings - 2014 16th Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality, SVR 2014, 45–52.

Di Serio, Ã., Ibáñez, M. B. & Kloos, C. D. 2013. Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers and Education, 68, 586–596.

Gresse von Wangenheim, C., Witt, T. A., Borgatto, A. F., Nunes, J. V., Lacerda, T. C., Krone, C. & Souza, L. de O. 2016. A Usability Score for Mobile Phone Applications Based on Heuristics. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 8(1), 23–58.

Halimah Badioze Zaman. 2009. Simbiosis seni, sains dan teknologi berasingan ke multimedia-fusion. Siri syarahan perdana profesor,. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Kosc, L. 1974. Developmentol Dyscalculia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7(3), 164–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002221947400700309

KoÅ¡Ä, L. 1981. Neuropsychological implications of diagnosis and treatment of mathematical learning disabilities. Topics in Learning & Learning Disabilities, 1(3), 19–30. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=1982-05983-001&site=ehost-live

Kostaras, N. N. & Xenos, M. N. 2009. Assessing the usability of augmented reality systems. 13th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, (September), 197–201.

Nayebi, F., Desharnais, J. M. & Abran, A. 2012. The state of the art of mobile application usability evaluation. 2012 25th IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering: Vision for a Greener Future, CCECE 2012, (May).

Nielsen, J. 1994. Usability Inspection Methods. Conference Companion, pg.413–414.

Nielsen, J. 2001a. Ten Usability Heuristic.

Nielsen, J. 2001b. Success Rate: The Simplest Usability Metric. Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox, 18, 3–5.

Sahin, S. & Uluyol, C. 2016. Preservice teachers’ perception and use of personal learning environments (PLEs). International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(2), 141–161.

Squires, D. & Preece, J. 1996. Usability and learning: Evaluating the potential of educational software. Computers and Education, 27(1), 15–22.

Stoll, R. D., Pina, A. A., Gary, K. & Amresh, A. 2017. Usability of a Smartphone Application to Support the Prevention and Early Intervention of Anxiety in Youth. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 24(4), 393–404.

Te’eni, D., Carey, J. & Zhang, P. 2007. Human-Computer Interaction: Developing Effective Organizational Information System. USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.