GLCM and PSNR Analysis of Woven Fabric Images Made from Natural Dyes Due to Sunlight Exposure

Patrisius Batarius - Widya Mandira Catholic University, Jl. San Juan 2, Kupang, 85361, Indonesia
Albertus Santoso - bAtma Jaya Yogyakarta University, Jl. babarsari, Depo Seleman-Yogygakarta, 55281, Indonesia
Alfry Aristo Jansen Sinlae - Widya Mandira Catholic University, Jl. San Juan 2, Kupang, 85361, Indonesia


Citation Format:



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.62527/joiv.8.4.2265

Abstract


Traditional woven fabrics generally use natural dyes that come from the local area. Natural dyes are often considered low quality if exposed to sunlight. This study aims to analyze the effect of sunlight on the image of woven fabrics made from natural dyes. The natural dyes used come from noni (Morinda citrofolia L), which produces a red color; Tarum (Indigofera tinctoria L), which produces a blue-black color; and corn starch juice, which produces a white color. A thread made of cotton is dipped and cooked to produce the desired color. The analysis is done by comparing the value of GLCM (Grey Lever Co-Coruent Matrix) features, changes in the value of Mean Square Error (MSE), and Peak Signal Noise Ratio (PSNR) with the original image. The original image is taken before the woven fabric is dried in the sun. The changing image is taken after the woven fabric is dried in the sun with variations in drying times. The drying time of woven fabric is 1 hour. Sun drying starts from 09:00 to 14:00. The distance between the original and sun-dried images is 30 cm. The original image and the sun-dried image went through cropping and resizing the image to be the same size. The grayscale image type is used for the GLCM, MSE, and PSNR comparison process. The image size used is 128x128 for woven fabric images with three kinds of colors (white, red, and blue) and 256x256 pixels for images with white color. The results showed that the quality of the images produced at drying hours of 09.00-10.00 to 14.00-15.00 tended to be low, with a significant difference between the original image and the changed image. The lowest point of quality lies in the drying time of 12.00-13.00 and 13.00-14.00. For the GLCM features, the sun-dried image at 14.00-15.00 has a homogeneity value close to the original value. For contrast features, the image dried at 10.00-11.00 has a contrast value that is close to the original image contrast value. This shows the smaller the difference in pixel intensity in the image.

Keywords


GLCM; PSNR; Natural dye; woven fabric; image

Full Text:

PDF

References


M. Moezzi, M. Ghane, and D. Semnani, “Predicting the tensile properties of UV degraded Nylon66/polyester woven fabric using regression and artificial neural network models,” J. Eng. Fiber. Fabr., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2015, doi: 10.1177/155892501501000101.

M. E. Khan, “Comparative Study on Dyeing of Cotton, Modal and Lyocell Fabrics Using Bifunctional and Polyfunctional Reactive Dyes,” J. Text. Sci. Technol., vol. 06, no. 01, pp. 40–48, 2020, doi: 10.4236/jtst.2020.61004.

S. Sofyan, F. Failisnur, and S. Silfia, “Pengaruh jenis dan metode mordan terhadap kualitas pewarnaan kain katunmenggunakan limbah kulit jengkol (Archidendron jiringa),” J. Litbang Ind., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2018.

R. Mansour, S. Dhouib, and F. Sakli, “UV Protection and Dyeing Properties of Wool Fabrics Dyed with Aqueous Extracts of Madder Roots, Chamomiles, Pomegranate Peels, and Apple Tree Branches Barks,” 2022. doi: 10.1080/15440478.2020.1758280.

E. Rahayuningsih et al., “Optimization of cotton fabrics dyeing process using various natural dye extracts,” J. Rekayasa Proses, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 58, 2022, doi: 10.22146/jrekpros.70397.

A. Kumar and A. Konar, “Dyeing of Textiles with Natural Dyes,” Nat. Dye., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 76–81, 2011, doi: 10.5772/21341.

Ö. Erdem Işmal, L. Yildirim, and E. Özdoǧan, “Use of almond shell extracts plus biomordants as effective textile dye,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 70, pp. 61–67, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.055.

Y. G. Naisumu, Emilia Juliyanti Bria, and Welli Herlince Kasse, “Utilization of Natural Dyes for Futus Woven Fabrics as an Alternative to Dye for Plant Tissue Preparations,” Bioeduscience, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 96–107, 2022, doi: 10.22236/j.bes/618079.

N. Kusumawati, A. Kristyanto, and S. Samik, “Exploration of Natural Dyes by Using a Combination of Caesalpinia sappan and Leucaena leucocephala L. Leaves.,” vol. 1, no. Snk, pp. 33–37, 2020, doi: 10.2991/snk-19.2019.9.

S. Purwani and T. D. M. Ndawu, “Studi Eksperimen Pencelupan Fragmen Batik dengan Zat Pewarna Alam Indigo, Jolawe dan Tingi,” J. Socia Akad., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2019.

M. Raze, F. Telegin, and S. Rahman, “Eco-friendly dyeing of wool fabric using natural dye extracted from onions outer shell by using water and organic solvents,” ResearchGate, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 1–19, 2016.

T. Rahayuningsih, F. S. Rejeki, E. R. Wedowati, and D. Widhowati, “Preliminary study of natural dyes application on batik,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 475, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/475/1/012069.

T. B. Teklemedhin, “Dyeing of Wool Fabric Using Natural Dye and Natural Mordant Extracts,” 2018. doi: 10.31031/tteft.2018.04.000593.

R. Ribeiro et al., “Predicting Physical Properties of Woven Fabrics via Automated Machine Learning and Textile Design and Finishing Features,” in IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, I. Maglogiannis, L. Iliadis, and E. Pimenidis, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 244–255. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-49186-4_21.

U. Sara, M. Akter, and M. S. Uddin, “Image Quality Assessment through FSIM, SSIM, MSE and PSNR—A Comparative Study,” J. Comput. Commun., vol. 07, no. 03, pp. 8–18, 2019, doi: 10.4236/jcc.2019.73002.

Wildan, Di. N. Santi, A. A. Mahfudh, and M. A. Soeleman, “Image enhancement segmentation Indonesian’s Batik based on fuzzy C-means clustering using median filter,” in Proceedings - 2017 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication: Empowering Technology for a Better Human Life, iSemantic 2017, 2017, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1109/ISEMANTIC.2017.8251833.

J. A. Lian, “Image Sharpening with Optimized PSNR,” in Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Signal and Image Processing Applications, ICSIPA 2019, 2019, pp. 106–110. doi: 10.1109/ICSIPA45851.2019.8977787.

N. Taxak and S. Singhal, “High PSNR based Image Fusion by Weighted Average Brovery Transform Method,” in Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on 2019 Devices for Integrated Circuit, DevIC 2019, 2019, pp. 451–455. doi: 10.1109/DEVIC.2019.8783400.

D. Sale and S. Sawant, “Wavelet based selection for fusion of medical images,” in Proceedings - 2nd International Conference on Computing, Communication, Control and Automation, ICCUBEA 2016, 2017, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICCUBEA.2016.7860049.

M. B. Akbar, “Comparison and Analysis several Wavelet from Daubechies Family in Image Compression,” 2020 8th Int. Conf. Cyber IT Serv. Manag. CITSM 2020, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1109/CITSM50537.2020.9268908.

S. Likhitha and R. Baskar, “Performance Analysis of Median Filter in Comparison with Gabor Filter for Skin Cancer MRI Images Based on PSNR and MSE,” in 2022 11th International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART), 2022, pp. 601–605. doi: 10.1109/SMART55829.2022.10047499.

I. A. Gavrilov and K. K. Nosirov, “Quality Evaluation of Compressed Images Based on Prediction Errors of Pixel Values,” 2018 14th Int. Sci. Conf. Actual Probl. Electron. Instrum. Eng. APEIE 2018 - Proc., pp. 33–36, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1109/APEIE.2018.8545618.

I. A. Sabilla, M. Meirisdiana, D. Sunaryono, and M. Husni, “Best Ratio Size of Image in Steganography using Portable Document Format with Evaluation RMSE, PSNR, and SSIM,” in Proceedings - 2021 4th International Conference on Computer and Informatics Engineering: IT-Based Digital Industrial Innovation for the Welfare of Society, IC2IE 2021, 2021, pp. 289–294. doi: 10.1109/IC2IE53219.2021.9649198.

H. Hamdani, A. Septiarini, A. Sunyoto, S. Suyanto, and F. Utaminingrum, “Detection of oil palm leaf disease based on color histogram and supervised classifier,” Optik (Stuttg)., vol. 245, no. July, p. 167753, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167753.

G. V and D. V. P.T., “Fabric Defect Identification Using Back Propagation Neural Networks,” vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2017.

A. R. Juwita and A. Solichin, “Batik pattern identification using GLCM and artificial neural network backpropagation,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Informatics and Computing, ICIC 2018, 2018, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/IAC.2018.8780412.

J. Kusanti and A. Suprapto, “Combination of Otsu and Canny Method to Identify the Characteristics of Solo Batik as Surakarta Traditional Batik,” Proc. - 2019 2nd Int. Conf. Comput. Informatics Eng. Artif. Intell. Roles Ind. Revolut. 4.0, IC2IE 2019, pp. 63–68, 2019, doi: 10.1109/IC2IE47452.2019.8940884.

F. U. Karimah and A. Harjoko, “Classification of batik kain besurek image using speed up robust features (SURF) and gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM),” Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 788, pp. 81–91, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-7242-0_7.

N. Sulistianingsih, I. Soesanti, and R. Hartanto, “Classification of batik image using grey level co-occurrence matrix feature extraction and correlation based feature selection,” 2018 Int. Semin. Res. Inf. Technol. Intell. Syst. ISRITI 2018, pp. 492–497, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ISRITI.2018.8864237.

S. M. Al Sasongko, E. D. Jayanti, and S. Ariessaputra, “Application of Gray Scale Matrix Technique for Identification of Lombok Songket Patterns Based on Backpropagation Learning,” Int. J. Informatics Vis., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 835–841, 2022, doi: 10.30630/joiv.6.4.1532.

Patrisius Batarius, Alfry Aristo Sinlae, and Elisabeth F. Fahik, “Analysis of the Quality of Natural Dyes in Weaving Exposed to Sunlight Using MSE and PSNR Parameters,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 797–802, 2022, doi: 10.29207/resti.v6i5.4339.