The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).
If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.
Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.
BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JOIV473,
author = {Meri Azmi and Yance Sonatha and Indri Rahmayuni and Kristine Mae Paboreal Dunque and Dwi Sudarno Putra},
title = {GDSS Prototype Model for Supplier Selection at MDM Cooperative},
journal = {JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
year = {2021},
keywords = {AHP; BORDA; GDSS; MDM cooperative; TOPSIS.},
abstract = {MDM is a trade cooperative business unit that supplies healthy food options for consumers around the Andalas University campus. So far, the selection of suppliers that provide supply goods to the stores is only based on the trust between both parties, which is the principle of mutual acquaintance and kinship. The problems that may arise from a process like this are the lack of the right supplier, unavailability of goods, relatively higher product prices, late delivery, and low-quality goods. Therefore, we need a GDSS that is capable of overcoming these problems. This GDSS helps in decision-making by determining the right supplier for each of the stores owned by the MDM Cooperative. The methods used are AHP, TOPSIS, and BORDA, involving six criteria and five tested alternatives. The AHP method is used to obtain the weight of each criterion taken from the pairwise comparison matrix. The TOPSIS method is used to determine which suppliers get priority for supply goods. Combining the AHP and TOPSIS methods can reduce the weaknesses of the TOPSIS itself by giving subjective weights. The use of the BORDA method can provide maximum results in selecting this supplier. This GDSS also involves three decision-making bodies: the head of the cooperative, the deputy, and the treasurer. The results of this prototype can show the best alternative selected based on the ranking method.},
issn = {2549-9904}, pages = {16--21}, doi = {10.30630/joiv.5.1.473},
url = {http://joiv.org/index.php/joiv/article/view/473}
}
Refworks Citation Data :
@article{{JOIV}{473}, author = {Azmi, M., Sonatha, Y., Rahmayuni, I., Paboreal Dunque, K., Putra, D.}, title = {GDSS Prototype Model for Supplier Selection at MDM Cooperative}, journal = {JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization}, volume = {5}, number = {1}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.30630/joiv.5.1.473}, url = {} }Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
__________________________________________________________________________
JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization
ISSN 2549-9610 (print) | 2549-9904 (online)
Organized by Department of Information Technology - Politeknik Negeri Padang, and Institute of Visual Informatics - UKM and Soft Computing and Data Mining Centre - UTHM
W : http://joiv.org
E : joiv@pnp.ac.id, hidra@pnp.ac.id, rahmat@pnp.ac.id
View JOIV Stats
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.