GDSS Prototype Model for Supplier Selection at MDM Cooperative

Meri Azmi - Department of Information Technology, Politeknik Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
Yance Sonatha - Department of Information Technology, Politeknik Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
Indri Rahmayuni - Department of Information Technology, Politeknik Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
Kristine Mae Paboreal Dunque - University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines
Dwi Sudarno Putra - Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia

Citation Format:



MDM is a trade cooperative business unit that supplies healthy food options for consumers around the Andalas University campus. So far, the selection of suppliers that provide supply goods to the stores is only based on the trust between both parties, which is the principle of mutual acquaintance and kinship. The problems that may arise from a process like this are the lack of the right supplier, unavailability of goods, relatively higher product prices, late delivery, and low-quality goods. Therefore, we need a GDSS that is capable of overcoming these problems. This GDSS helps in decision-making by determining the right supplier for each of the stores owned by the MDM Cooperative. The methods used are AHP, TOPSIS, and BORDA, involving six criteria and five tested alternatives. The AHP method is used to obtain the weight of each criterion taken from the pairwise comparison matrix. The TOPSIS method is used to determine which suppliers get priority for supply goods. Combining the AHP and TOPSIS methods can reduce the weaknesses of the TOPSIS itself by giving subjective weights. The use of the BORDA method can provide maximum results in selecting this supplier. This GDSS also involves three decision-making bodies: the head of the cooperative, the deputy, and the treasurer. The results of this prototype can show the best alternative selected based on the ranking method.


AHP; BORDA; GDSS; MDM cooperative; TOPSIS.

Full Text:



R. kartika dewi, “Group Decision Support System Based on AHP-TOPSIS for Culinary Recommendation System,” J. Ilmu Komput. Dan Inf., vol. 12, no. 2, 2019.

I. K. A. Pirnanda, I. M. A. Pradnyana, and I. M. A. Wirawan, “Decision Support System for Household Labor Services Selection ‘Best Helper’ Using AHP and TOPSIS Methods,” Sci. J. Inform., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 106–115, 2019.

N. K. Y. Suartini, I. M. A. Wirawan, and D. G. H. Divayana, “DSS for" E-Private" Using a Combination of AHP and SAW Methods,” IJCCS Indones. J. Comput. Cybern. Syst., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 251–262, 2019.

S. Sucipto and D. K. Wibisono, “Implementation of Topsis Method Selection of Student Achievement Lane Stmik Pringsewu,” IJISCS Int. J. Inf. Syst. Comput. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 2019.

M. A. Budhi and R. Wardoyo, “Group decision support system determination of best employee using Topsis and Borda,” IJCCS Indones. J. Comput. Cybern. Syst., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 165–176, 2017.

A. Coulibaly, P. Zaraté, and G. Camilleri, “Implementing Voting Tools in GRUS,” 2017.

T. F. A. Aziz, S. Sulistiyono, H. Harsiti, A. Setyawan, A. Suhendar, and T. A. Munandar, “Group decision support system for employee performance evaluation using combined simple additive weighting and Borda,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, vol. 830, no. 3, p. 032014.

R. P. Palha, P. Zarate, A. T. de Almeida, and H. Nurmi, “Choosing a Voting Procedure for the GDSS GRUS,” in International Conference on Group Decision and Negotiation, 2017, pp. 163–174.

R. P. Sari and F. Istikoma & Supriadi, The Comparison of SAW BORDA and TOPSIS BORDA Methods In the Zakat Recipient Determination System Education programs (Case Study: BAZNAS, West Kalimantan Province). WMA, 2020.

I. Siregar, W. Yahyan, and D. Mallisza, “Decision Support System in Choosing The Quality of Charcoal Briquettes from Coconut Shell to Improve The Quality and Maximised by The Method of Analytical Hierarchy Process (the case study in Padang pariaman),” Digit. Zone J. Teknol. Inf. Dan Komun., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 199–205, 2019.

N. Saraswati, S. Kusumadewi, and L. Iswari, “Group Decision Support System (GDSS) untuk Pemilihan Konsentrasi Studi Mahasiswa Menggunakan Ahp dan Topsis,” Telematika, vol. 12, p. 70, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.35671/telematika.v12i1.788.

S. Sumiyatun, “Gdss multi Kriteria Penentuan Strategi Marketing Terbaik Perguruan Tinggi,” J. Saintekom, vol. 9, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.33020/Saintekom.v9i1.73.

G. V. Ekawardhani, Z. Rusdi, and D. Trisnawarman, “Gdss Penilaian Kinerja dan Peringkat Guru pada Yayasan Pendidikan Asisi dengan Metode AHP dan BORDA,” Comput. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.24912/computatio.v1i1.244.

G. Ogiana, N. M. A. E. D. Wirastuti, and W. G. Ariastina, “Group Decision Support System (GDSS) Untuk Evaluasi Penawaran Pekerjaan Konstruksi Menggunakan Metode AHP dan Borda,” Maj. Ilm. Teknol. Elektro, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 19–26, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.24843/MITE.2017.v16i03p04.

“Group Decision Support System (GDSS) dengan Metode Entropy untuk Menentukan Prioritas Antrian Layanan Rumah Sakit Menggunakan Multiple Channel Model (M/M/s) | JATISI (Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi),” Accessed: Mar. 06, 2021. [Online]. Available:

E. Turban and E. Jay, “Decision Support Systemand Inteligent System (Versi bahasa Indonesia),” Ed. Ke-7 Andi Offset Yogyak., 2005.

T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,” Int. J. Serv. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83–98, 2008.

P. Agarwal, M. Sahai, V. Mishra, M. Bag, and V. Singh, “Supplier selection in dynamic environment using analytic hierarchy process,” Int. J. Inf. Eng. Electron. Bus., vol. 6, no. 4, p. 20, 2014.

D. L. Olson, “Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models,” Math. Comput. Model., vol. 40, no. 7–8, pp. 721–727, 2004.

P. Tannenbaum and R. Arnold, Excursions in modern mathematics. Pearson Boston, MA, 2014.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization
ISSN 2549-9610  (print) | 2549-9904 (online)
Organized by Department of Information Technology - Politeknik Negeri Padang, and Institute of Visual Informatics - UKM and Soft Computing and Data Mining Centre - UTHM
Published by Department of Information Technology - Politeknik Negeri Padang
W :
E :,,

View JOIV Stats

Creative Commons License is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.