Hesitant Fuzzy-Stochastic Data Envelopment Analysis (HF-SDEA) Model for Benchmarking

Dahlan Abdullah - Department of Informatics, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh, Indonesia
- Hartono - Department of Computer Science, Universitas IBBI, Medan, Indonesia
Cut Ita Erliana - Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh, Indonesia

Citation Format:

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30630/joiv.5.1.405


The Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method is a method commonly used in benchmarking. The Dynamic Data Envelopment Analysis (DDEA) method was proposed to improve the DEA method in the benchmarking process. The DDEA method proposed can determine the effectiveness of the Decision Making Unit (DMU). The disadvantage of the DDEA model is that it cannot handle problems that involve benchmarking for stochastic data. To improve the DDEA method, the Stochastic Data Envelopment Analysis (SDEA) method is proposed which can be used for benchmarking involving stochastic data. The SDEA method itself has weaknesses in dealing with noise and uncertainty problems that will appear in the assessment process. The purpose of the research conducted by the researcher was to use the Hesitant Fuzzy method in optimizing the SDEA method so that the Hesitant Fuzzy model - Stochastic Data Envelopment Analysis (HF-SDEA) could be carried out benchmarking process in a situation where the assessment contained many elements of uncertainty. The results of this study are benchmarking methods that can do benchmarking for stochastic data on conditions that contain elements of uncertainty.


Data envelopment analysis; dynamic data envelopment analysis; stochastic data envelopment analysis; hesitant fuzzy.

Full Text:



A. Emrouznejad and G. Yang, “A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 61, pp. 4–8, Mar. 2018.

M. Ehrgott, A. Holder, and O. Nohadani, “Uncertain Data Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 268, no. 1, pp. 231–242, Jul. 2018.

C. Kahraman and E. Tolga, “Data envelopment analysis using fuzzy concept,” in Proceedings. 1998 28th IEEE International Symposium on Multiple- Valued Logic (Cat. No.98CB36138), 1998, pp. 338–343.

M. Tavana, A. Hatami-Marbini, and A. Emrouznejad, “Productivity Growth and Efficiency Measurements in Fuzzy Environments with an Application to Health Care,” Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. Appl., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–35, Apr. 2012.

Peijun Guo, H. Tanaka, and M. Inuiguchi, “Self-organizing fuzzy aggregation models to rank the objects with multiple attributes,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 573–580, Sep. 2000.

A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, Nov. 1978.

S. Yousefi, H. Shabanpour, R. Fisher, and R. F. Saen, “Evaluating and ranking sustainable suppliers by robust dynamic data envelopment analysis,” Measurement, vol. 83, pp. 72–85, Apr. 2016.

O. B. Olesen and N. C. Petersen, “Stochastic Data Envelopment Analysis—A review,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 251, no. 1, pp. 2–21, May 2016.

S. Ahmadvand and M. S. Pishvaee, “An efficient method for kidney allocation problem: a credibility-based fuzzy common weights data envelopment analysis approach,” Health Care Manag Sci, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 587–603, Dec. 2018.

P. Peykani, E. Mohammadi, M. Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, and F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, “Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis Approach for Ranking of Stocks with an Application to Tehran Stock Exchange,” Advances in Mathematical Finance and Applications, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 31–43, Mar. 2019.

S.-P. Wan, Y.-L. Qin, and J.-Y. Dong, “A hesitant fuzzy mathematical programming method for hybrid multi-criteria group decision making with hesitant fuzzy truth degrees,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 138, pp. 232–248, Dec. 2017.

M. Ashtiani and M. A. Azgomi, “A hesitant fuzzy model of computational trust considering hesitancy, vagueness and uncertainty,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 42, pp. 18–37, May 2016.

H. Liu, Y. Ma, and L. Jiang, “Managing incomplete preferences and consistency improvement in hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations with applications in group decision making,” Information Fusion, vol. 51, pp. 19–29, Nov. 2019.

Y. Wang, S. Wang, C. Dang, and W. Ge, “Nonparametric quantile frontier estimation under shape restriction,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 232, no. 3, pp. 671–678, Feb. 2014.

S. Jradi and J. Ruggiero, “Stochastic data envelopment analysis: A quantile regression approach to estimate the production frontier,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 278, no. 2, pp. 385–393, Oct. 2019.

A. Azadeh, S. Motevali Haghighi, M. Zarrin, and S. Khaefi, “Performance evaluation of Iranian electricity distribution units by using stochastic data envelopment analysis,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 73, pp. 919–931, Dec. 2015.

W. Liu, Y.-M. Wang, and S. Lyu, “The upper and lower bound evaluation based on the quantile efficiency in stochastic data envelopment analysis,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 85, pp. 14–24, Nov. 2017.

S. Lertworasirikul, S.-C. Fang, J. A. Joines, and H. L.W. Nuttle, “Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): a possibility approach,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 379–394, Oct. 2003.

A. Hatami-Marbini, S. Saati, and M. Tavana, “An ideal-seeking fuzzy data envelopment analysis framework,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1062–1070, Sep. 2010.

A. Hatami-Marbini, A. Emrouznejad, and M. Tavana, “A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: Two decades in the making,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 214, no. 3, pp. 457–472, Nov. 2011.

N. Ahmady, M. Azadi, S. A. H. Sadeghi, and R. F. Saen, “A novel fuzzy data envelopment analysis model with double frontiers for supplier selection,” International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 87–98, Apr. 2013.

M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, M. Falagario, and F. Sciancalepore, “A cross-efficiency fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis technique for performance evaluation of Decision Making Units under uncertainty,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 79, pp. 103–114, Jan. 2015.

W. Zhou, J. Chen, Z. Xu, and S. Meng, “Hesitant fuzzy preference envelopment analysis and alternative improvement,” Information Sciences, vol. 465, pp. 105–117, Oct. 2018.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization
ISSN 2549-9610  (print) | 2549-9904 (online)
Organized by Department of Information Technology - Politeknik Negeri Padang, and Institute of Visual Informatics - UKM and Soft Computing and Data Mining Centre - UTHM
Published by Department of Information Technology - Politeknik Negeri Padang
W : http://joiv.org
E : joiv@pnp.ac.id, hidra@pnp.ac.id, rahmat@pnp.ac.id

View JOIV Stats

Creative Commons License is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.